Monday, March 21, 2016

European Identity - From a construct to the innate


I recently read an article on Facebook criticising the rewriting of European history through the use of school text books. The article claimed that the books were glossing over the many divisions within European history in order to create the sense of a common European identity and thus an unstoppable process culminating naturally in a European State.

I am not going to talk about the rights and wrongs of the case against the textbooks, as I have not read them. Rather, I would like to discuss the idea that there is no such thing as a European identity.
Jean Paul Sarte once said that "we are what we make of what others make of us". A bit of a confusing statement I know :) but essentially he was always of the opinion that identity is something we create when dealing with the world around us.

The question is not therefore, is European identity something that has always existed but is this something that we can identify now. Are there things that identify Europeans as different to the rest of the world which overrides the differences between the individual identities? That does not mean that we must get rid of the others. We all carry many identities: I am English, British, a husband, a man, a teacher etc .  . These all play different roles in my life.

Returning to the idea if a constructed identity; both the British and American identities are the products of very discernible historical events. If you were to ask a resident of England living in 1650 about their sense of identity then you would be unlikely to get anything wider than English.  The Act of Union of 1707 created the political entity of Britain but it took many years to forge a common identity.  This process was still going on in the 19th century. 

In a similar way American identity was forged through the War of Independence yet even as late as the 1860s this identity was still somewhat artificial. The Civil War was horrifically bloody and pitted two very different identities against one another. The south were able to declare succession due in a large part to the lack of a sense of common identity with the north.

Yet today, in 2016, would we question the existence of either British or American identity? Of course not, they have both been forged through the common histories and exploits of their respective people. As with many things in life,  hardships often play a greater role in creating identity than prosperity. The idea of a common "other" an "enemy" will cement the sense of a shared identity faster than anything else.

This unfortunate fact means that until Europeans are forced to face the world together, then they probably won't. That said, it is just a matter of time before this identity is forced upon us and we have to 'make of what others make of us'. 

Jeremy

3 comments:

  1. I feel very concerned about these problems of European identity. And I agree with several of the points you make: in particular that we all have a multiple identity.
    I have even developped this in 2 articles on my own blog.
    (all the articles are trilingual - English is the 3rd language).
    Identity and solidarity:
    http://uropi.canalblog.com/archives/2009/12/13/16128225.html
    Can we save Europe:
    http://uropi.canalblog.com/archives/2011/11/13/22662295.html

    But there is one point I don't agree with: tha fact that a common enemy is necessary to forge an identity.
    I'm not saying you're wrong: this it what happened in history: 3 wars against France were necessary to forge the German identity (with Bismarck, the Kaiser, Hitler), two of which were the most murderous in human history.
    But we don't want this any more, this is why we decided to build the European Union: to put an end to wars in Europe once and for all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would like to agree with you. Ofcourse I don't want an nother war inorder to forge a common identity but all we have is history to etach us. I am not sure we can create an identity artificially as for example the Soviet Union tried to do. They created the union first and then the identity. It broke up before this achieved anything and I feel if forced, the EU and European Identity would do the same.

      Delete
  2. Wars did forge some countries' identity, but they also, and above all, destroyed Europe.

    This is what the European "Founding fathers" realized: the great originality of the European construction is the wish to unite European peoples peacefully, without conquering the others.

    The European identity already exists and has more or less always existed since the Greeks and the Romans. It is based on a common culture: when you study philosophy for instance, you do not deal with national philosophies: you do not care whether Aristoteles and Plato were Greek, Kant and Hegel German, Descartes French and Locke British… they're all European Philosophers… the same with "classical" music, painting… etc.

    The problem is not to forge an artificial identity but to become aware of our European identity. It's so obvious when we live in Africa or Asia, there we feel European…

    And the fact that we speak so many different languages doesn't help. As I often say, our European languages are the different instruments playing the same symphony.

    ReplyDelete